Further Reflections On Weezy: The Nature Of Flow
Sunday, September 28th, 2008
Keep a hold of those trousers bro. You don’t wanna make yourself look silly now, do ya?
According to Dallas it’s Weezy’s birthday today, so given that there was a decent response to my previous post and I’ve had a chance to think about the issue at hand a little more, I thought I’d extend my musings on Weezy F. Baby a little further. Man, I love myself a lazy Sunday afternoon.
However, I’d be remiss if I didn’t point you in the direction of Brandon’s exceptional two-part piece which engages with the same ideas that I was trying to get down with but in a far more developed and intelligent way (shouts to reader WestIndianArchie for the recommendation). What I found particularly interesting about this piece was that Brandon incorporates a discussion of shifts in production aesthetics and how this has consequences on the style of vocal delivery that is required in order for a song to feel homogeneous. In short, you can’t have Nas’ lyrical flow sit over the top of the more stripped-down, jittery staccato beats that have now found favour with the masses because their very nature necessitates a more off-kilter, abstract style of rhyme. Weezy would sound similarly goofy rhyming over the instrumental of ‘It Ain’t Hard To Tell’. I accept this, and it goes a long way to explaining why Wayne remains a mystery to me because at a base level I don’t ever really feel the beats that he’s rapping over: I’m lost and pretty much lacking engagement before I even attempt to get my head around what’s coming out of his mouth.
But this leads me down another avenue in the discussion. Almost unquestionably, the pinnacle of any MC’s achievement is their flow. Hip hop is so intrinsically a case of style over substance that in reality it doesn’t matter what you’re talking about, but rather the way in which it is delivered (although naturally the true greats transcend this generalisation). But then what do we really mean when we talk about flow? Water flows. Air flows. The word by definition means a movement that is smooth and continuous. In which case, can we really talk about the proficiency and accomplishment of an MC’s flow - if this is the key parameter on which we judge their ability - when their style of delivery is at times the deliberate antithesis of the term itself?
Now I don’t want to go too over the top here. I realise that what I’m now beginning to engage in is a slightly silly semantic argument that perhaps doesn’t hold a lot of weight and would be relatively easy to debunk. I’m also keen to point out that I’m not saying that Weezy hasn’t got flow in the more traditional sense of the word. Of course he does. It also doesn’t mean that some MCs who I love haven’t been deliberately playing with more staccato, off-beat rhythms since way back when (see Pharoah Monch). But when it comes down to it I guess the root of my problem here is that when I listen to the music coming out of the South its deliberate stop and start aesthetic is at odds with what I love about hip hop music in the first place: its sense of unshakable momentum. It flows.
Rather obviously, this is all entirely subjective. One man’s caviar is another man’s stinking pile of fish eggs. Does Lil’ Wayne’s ‘flow’ flow? Does it really matter? Am I misunderstanding something crucial about Wayne’s skills as a lyricist? Are you? Will his heralded genius endure when inevitable shifts in the genre come around again?
Who knows. I still don’t like the guy though.

